<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Go Ahead And</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegoaheadand.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com</link>
	<description>Words and Music by Joel Abbott</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:21:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My Laurie Anderson Remix by Alan in SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/my-laurie-anderson-remix/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan in SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/my-laurie-anderson-remix/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I just heard your remix, and it is outstanding! If I were in charge, I would have crowned it the winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard your remix, and it is outstanding! If I were in charge, I would have crowned it the winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best and Worst TV Shows of 2009 by A.Cristy</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/best-and-worst-tv-shows-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Cristy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 21:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/best-and-worst-tv-shows-of-2009/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I enjoy &lt;a href=&quot;http://instanttvshows.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Streaming TV Shows&lt;/a&gt; online because its easy and you can watch your favorite tv show whenever you want... The problem is that most of them use Content Blockers...I think some layer ads combined with CPM ads are making the same money for the webmaster...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy <a href="http://instanttvshows.com" rel="nofollow">Streaming TV Shows</a> online because its easy and you can watch your favorite tv show whenever you want&#8230; The problem is that most of them use Content Blockers&#8230;I think some layer ads combined with CPM ads are making the same money for the webmaster&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Play More&#8221; by Modesto Guild</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/play-more/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Modesto Guild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=104#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hey Great Blog found it on Aol . BTW Check out my Blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Great Blog found it on Aol . BTW Check out my Blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by MattOBLICTLat</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>MattOBLICTLat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Thank you for tale!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for tale!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by &#8220;Play More&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Play More&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] I must say that the discussion about digital distribution in the previous post is worth a look.  There&#8217;s really interesting information that I haven&#8217;t seen anywhere [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I must say that the discussion about digital distribution in the previous post is worth a look.  There&#8217;s really interesting information that I haven&#8217;t seen anywhere [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by Kevin Rivers</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Rivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,

Thank you for your kind words. If you have any other questions regarding WaTunes and/or the music industry, please shoot us a line. I wish you all the best in your music endeavors. :)


Kevin Rivers
CEO, WaTunes
info@watunes.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,</p>
<p>Thank you for your kind words. If you have any other questions regarding WaTunes and/or the music industry, please shoot us a line. I wish you all the best in your music endeavors. <img src='http://www.thegoaheadand.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kevin Rivers<br />
CEO, WaTunes<br />
<a href="mailto:info@watunes.com">info@watunes.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by joelabbott</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>joelabbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Nicely done, Kevin.  I was just walking back from an open-mic just now thinking that I bet nobody was going to answer my questions.  This is really interesting information that I haven&#039;t heard anywhere else.  I wish WaTunes all the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done, Kevin.  I was just walking back from an open-mic just now thinking that I bet nobody was going to answer my questions.  This is really interesting information that I haven&#8217;t heard anywhere else.  I wish WaTunes all the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by Kevin Rivers</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Rivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,

I&#039;d be more than happy to answer your questions below:

Q: &quot;How hard is it to get on iTunes? How come WaTunes can do it for free? What’s the big mystery? Why do we need third parties? Why is this process not transparent?&quot;

A: Being an independent artist with a small catalog is extremely difficult to get on the iTunes Store. The reason is because iTunes deals with a lot of technical aspects of content delivery and processing which would cost them a lot more money if they offer each artist to go direct. As a simple solution they&#039;ve decided to work with distribution companies (Label/Content Providers) such as WaTunes who has an extensive catalog to be able to make their cost less and provide the artist what they want: Getting their music up on iTunes. iTunes is semi-selective on who they choose to be a Content Provider for them.

Q: &quot;Kevin, I reaffirm my assertion that it is counterintuitive to not pay for this service. Consumers are programmed to seek out deals, but when a deal sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Strange, but true. One of the reasons I originally didn’t even consider WaTunes is because I figured that making the distribution free would be overloading your systems and would cause a delay in my album, “Christmas and Glowsticks” distribution. Obviously, since it’s early November, and my album is a Christmas album, getting it distributed quickly is important. I only have a few weeks to make all my sales.&quot;

A: That&#039;s what separates us from that saying. What we offer is true and its good. We&#039;ve help thousands of artists get their contents on iTunes for free since our huge announcement in March and its only the beginning of great things yet to come. If you were to have your &quot;Christmas and Glowsticks&quot; album distributed to us say today (and if you were a VIP customer). I can certainly say that it would go live on iTunes (unless you would rather have it go live on a specific date like on Christmas Day) by this Friday. 

As mentioned earlier, I believe that every approach is great because it offers more options to the artist which is what I would like to see. This is why we believe that the WaTunes Social Platform is great and practically essential for virtually every artist (whether they use WaTunes, CD Baby, TuneCore, Catapult, or ReverbNation). We give you the ability to embed ANY widget your heart desires on our site, post comments to other users, communicate and talk with each other via Skype, sync your iTunes Artist profile to your WaTunes profile via our very new Sync feature, Post your MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, Blog, and Personal website links to your WaTunes profile. The best part is that you don&#039;t have to use our digital distribution services to have a WaTunes profile!

Our goal is to provide you with options, alternatives, and make things much more cost effective and simple for you with little to no effort. :)

Q: &quot;How hard is it to get on iTunes? How come WaTunes can do it for free? What’s the big mystery? Why do we need third parties? Why is this process not transparent?&quot;

A: As mentioned earlier, having a direct deal with iTunes (or any store) can be extremely difficult if you have a small catalog due to that each store has maintenance cost (technical procedures, delivery process, upkeep, account maintenance, account management, etc.). Each store would rather work with labels and large distributors to minimize their cost and keep accounting more simple and effective for them.

One of the great and really cool reasons that we offer it for FREE is that our free iTunes model is complimentary with other services within the WaTunes core business model. Unlike the popular belief, the truth is that there is no cost for digital distributors to put up contents on iTunes and the like, the cost of each distributor comes from the labor and investment of each artist. Our formula has proved that we can work harder and better for less! Which makes it every more appealing to the end user for exploring WaTunes.

I hope I&#039;ve answered some of your questions and if you have any other questions, please feel free to contact us. We&#039;d love to hear from you Joel! :)

Kevin Rivers
CEO, WaTunes
info@watunes.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be more than happy to answer your questions below:</p>
<p>Q: &#8220;How hard is it to get on iTunes? How come WaTunes can do it for free? What’s the big mystery? Why do we need third parties? Why is this process not transparent?&#8221;</p>
<p>A: Being an independent artist with a small catalog is extremely difficult to get on the iTunes Store. The reason is because iTunes deals with a lot of technical aspects of content delivery and processing which would cost them a lot more money if they offer each artist to go direct. As a simple solution they&#8217;ve decided to work with distribution companies (Label/Content Providers) such as WaTunes who has an extensive catalog to be able to make their cost less and provide the artist what they want: Getting their music up on iTunes. iTunes is semi-selective on who they choose to be a Content Provider for them.</p>
<p>Q: &#8220;Kevin, I reaffirm my assertion that it is counterintuitive to not pay for this service. Consumers are programmed to seek out deals, but when a deal sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Strange, but true. One of the reasons I originally didn’t even consider WaTunes is because I figured that making the distribution free would be overloading your systems and would cause a delay in my album, “Christmas and Glowsticks” distribution. Obviously, since it’s early November, and my album is a Christmas album, getting it distributed quickly is important. I only have a few weeks to make all my sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>A: That&#8217;s what separates us from that saying. What we offer is true and its good. We&#8217;ve help thousands of artists get their contents on iTunes for free since our huge announcement in March and its only the beginning of great things yet to come. If you were to have your &#8220;Christmas and Glowsticks&#8221; album distributed to us say today (and if you were a VIP customer). I can certainly say that it would go live on iTunes (unless you would rather have it go live on a specific date like on Christmas Day) by this Friday. </p>
<p>As mentioned earlier, I believe that every approach is great because it offers more options to the artist which is what I would like to see. This is why we believe that the WaTunes Social Platform is great and practically essential for virtually every artist (whether they use WaTunes, CD Baby, TuneCore, Catapult, or ReverbNation). We give you the ability to embed ANY widget your heart desires on our site, post comments to other users, communicate and talk with each other via Skype, sync your iTunes Artist profile to your WaTunes profile via our very new Sync feature, Post your MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, Blog, and Personal website links to your WaTunes profile. The best part is that you don&#8217;t have to use our digital distribution services to have a WaTunes profile!</p>
<p>Our goal is to provide you with options, alternatives, and make things much more cost effective and simple for you with little to no effort. <img src='http://www.thegoaheadand.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Q: &#8220;How hard is it to get on iTunes? How come WaTunes can do it for free? What’s the big mystery? Why do we need third parties? Why is this process not transparent?&#8221;</p>
<p>A: As mentioned earlier, having a direct deal with iTunes (or any store) can be extremely difficult if you have a small catalog due to that each store has maintenance cost (technical procedures, delivery process, upkeep, account maintenance, account management, etc.). Each store would rather work with labels and large distributors to minimize their cost and keep accounting more simple and effective for them.</p>
<p>One of the great and really cool reasons that we offer it for FREE is that our free iTunes model is complimentary with other services within the WaTunes core business model. Unlike the popular belief, the truth is that there is no cost for digital distributors to put up contents on iTunes and the like, the cost of each distributor comes from the labor and investment of each artist. Our formula has proved that we can work harder and better for less! Which makes it every more appealing to the end user for exploring WaTunes.</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;ve answered some of your questions and if you have any other questions, please feel free to contact us. We&#8217;d love to hear from you Joel! <img src='http://www.thegoaheadand.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kevin Rivers<br />
CEO, WaTunes<br />
<a href="mailto:info@watunes.com">info@watunes.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by joelabbott</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>joelabbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hm.  I even have a Tunecore page, and had completely forgotten about it.  It seems to be a little wonky on the formatting right now: http://www.tunecore.com/music/thegoaheadand.

I went and logged into my Tunecore account, and you&#039;re right, there is a widget, although mine doesn&#039;t work right now because I didn&#039;t pay for this year&#039;s renewal.  It looks nice, so thanks for telling me about it.

How hard is it to get on iTunes?  How come WaTunes can do it for free?  What&#039;s the big mystery?  Why do we need third parties?  Why is this process not transparent?

Currently, no one company seems to have everything I need.  Why is that?

You are both very responsive, and that gives your companies quite a leg up on the competition.  Because the internet, despite it&#039;s interactiveness, is a very cold, anonymous place.

Kevin, I reaffirm my assertion that it is counterintuitive to not pay for this service.  Consumers are programmed to seek out deals, but when a deal sounds too good to be true, it usually is.  Strange, but true.  One of the reasons I originally didn&#039;t even consider WaTunes is because I figured that making the distribution free would be overloading your systems and would cause a delay in my album, &quot;Christmas and Glowsticks&quot; distribution.  Obviously, since it&#039;s early November, and my album is a Christmas album, getting it distributed quickly is important.  I only have a few weeks to make all my sales.

Peter, what is the &quot;break-even&quot; threshold when Tunecore customers break-even on using Tunecore as their digital distributor?  How many digital sales (say, in iTunes) does an artist need to make to break even?  This seems like a key point for emerging artists.  Is it $20 dollars a year?  That seems logical--so that amounts to between 26 and 27 single song downloads, or just under three albums at ten dollars an album downloaded a year to recover the Tunecore renewal fee.

Let me take a stab at it, using my liberal-arts-major-math-skills.  Using my current distributor, who takes 9% of sales, but does not have a yearly renewal fee, if I sell a hundred albums at ten dollars an album, that&#039;s $1000.  Then iTunes takes its 30%, I&#039;m making $700.  Then my distributor takes 9%, which is $63 dollars, now I&#039;m making $637 dollars.  And then subtract the initial distribution fee of $25 dollars, and you get $612 dollars in the first year, and $637 every year after that.

Using Tunecore, I&#039;m making the full $700, minus the $20 yearly fee, so that&#039;s $680 dollars.  If you figure in the initial distribution to all the stores, then you have to subtract another $20+ dollars.  Giving you $660 in the first year, and $680 every year after that.

So in this scenario, with 100 albums sold, Tunecore wins by $48 the first year, and by $43 every year after that.

I need to get back to actually making music, rather than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  I even have a Tunecore page, and had completely forgotten about it.  It seems to be a little wonky on the formatting right now: <a href="http://www.tunecore.com/music/thegoaheadand" rel="nofollow">http://www.tunecore.com/music/thegoaheadand</a>.</p>
<p>I went and logged into my Tunecore account, and you&#8217;re right, there is a widget, although mine doesn&#8217;t work right now because I didn&#8217;t pay for this year&#8217;s renewal.  It looks nice, so thanks for telling me about it.</p>
<p>How hard is it to get on iTunes?  How come WaTunes can do it for free?  What&#8217;s the big mystery?  Why do we need third parties?  Why is this process not transparent?</p>
<p>Currently, no one company seems to have everything I need.  Why is that?</p>
<p>You are both very responsive, and that gives your companies quite a leg up on the competition.  Because the internet, despite it&#8217;s interactiveness, is a very cold, anonymous place.</p>
<p>Kevin, I reaffirm my assertion that it is counterintuitive to not pay for this service.  Consumers are programmed to seek out deals, but when a deal sounds too good to be true, it usually is.  Strange, but true.  One of the reasons I originally didn&#8217;t even consider WaTunes is because I figured that making the distribution free would be overloading your systems and would cause a delay in my album, &#8220;Christmas and Glowsticks&#8221; distribution.  Obviously, since it&#8217;s early November, and my album is a Christmas album, getting it distributed quickly is important.  I only have a few weeks to make all my sales.</p>
<p>Peter, what is the &#8220;break-even&#8221; threshold when Tunecore customers break-even on using Tunecore as their digital distributor?  How many digital sales (say, in iTunes) does an artist need to make to break even?  This seems like a key point for emerging artists.  Is it $20 dollars a year?  That seems logical&#8211;so that amounts to between 26 and 27 single song downloads, or just under three albums at ten dollars an album downloaded a year to recover the Tunecore renewal fee.</p>
<p>Let me take a stab at it, using my liberal-arts-major-math-skills.  Using my current distributor, who takes 9% of sales, but does not have a yearly renewal fee, if I sell a hundred albums at ten dollars an album, that&#8217;s $1000.  Then iTunes takes its 30%, I&#8217;m making $700.  Then my distributor takes 9%, which is $63 dollars, now I&#8217;m making $637 dollars.  And then subtract the initial distribution fee of $25 dollars, and you get $612 dollars in the first year, and $637 every year after that.</p>
<p>Using Tunecore, I&#8217;m making the full $700, minus the $20 yearly fee, so that&#8217;s $680 dollars.  If you figure in the initial distribution to all the stores, then you have to subtract another $20+ dollars.  Giving you $660 in the first year, and $680 every year after that.</p>
<p>So in this scenario, with 100 albums sold, Tunecore wins by $48 the first year, and by $43 every year after that.</p>
<p>I need to get back to actually making music, rather than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas and Glowsticks &#8211; Getting the distribution right this time. by Peter Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.thegoaheadand.com/christmas-and-glowsticks-getting-the-distribution-right-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegoaheadand.com/?p=85#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Something here gives me a moment&#039;s pause--you do know we have free pages for all, right? And a streaming widget that includes video, picture, even the ability for you to ask your fans to sign up with you? If you missed it, we really need to make sure we tell people about it! We worked really hard on these widgets and pages and much more, I&#039;d hate to think people didn&#039;t know about them!

--Peter
peter@tunecore.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something here gives me a moment&#8217;s pause&#8211;you do know we have free pages for all, right? And a streaming widget that includes video, picture, even the ability for you to ask your fans to sign up with you? If you missed it, we really need to make sure we tell people about it! We worked really hard on these widgets and pages and much more, I&#8217;d hate to think people didn&#8217;t know about them!</p>
<p>&#8211;Peter<br />
<a href="mailto:peter@tunecore.com">peter@tunecore.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
